The former PM has apparently tried to 'influence' the course of justice, according to the CJ. An elected PM has not got the right to ask for an opinion on what he thinks would be a better approach? Instead of giving advice by the servants of People to the head of peoples' representatives by interpreting the constitution, the the independence of judiciary resulted into issuing a contempt notice.
The judiciary should be an independent arm of the elected PM and help him in providing justice to the ones elected him to the highest post in Pakistan, the way he thinks best. The judiciary cannot decide the course of justice. They work in the structure laid down by the elected representatives.
Needless to say that the son of the same CJ on his personal request got his wish fulfilled; establishment of a commission. The independence of judicary did not result into court contempt when the son of CJ requested for a commission.
For how long and through how many ways we will continue insulting, character assassinating, disqualifying, murdering and hanging the true representatives of People?
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mHediQJ7Mss
The independence of the judiciary needs social review by the people of Pakistan otherwise it is fast becoming uncontrollable juggernaut of dictatorial practices that will ultimately result into choas. This time there will not be any 'chain' to shed her blood to keep Pakistan intact. Better late than never.
Thursday 28 March 2013
Wednesday 27 March 2013
The Democrats of Pakistan
The Dictator is IN and Principled Democrats of Pakistan, PML-N & PTI are Out
It is amazing to to note what has happened to the most vocal Punjabi; Shahbaz Sharif? Until recently he wanted to hang the elected President of Pakistan upside down. Why is he not raising his vice and mobilising people to bring the Dictator to Justice?
Where is Nawaz Sharif? The principled politician who took no time to take the President of Pakistan to Supreme court on so called "Memo-Gate"? Why is he not knocking at the door of Supreme Court regarding the dictator?
What has happened to the rest of PML-N? The party that draws pride from their 'struggle' for Democracy and 'pushing' the Dictator out of the country? Why they are not raising their voices?
Where is the biggest hypocrite of our political elite: Imran Khan? 'He will not take oath from a 'criminal' president'. But he took oath from a Dictator (Gen. Musharaf). According to the hypocrites of PTI, the current Goverment has been collaborating with USA regarding drone attacks and the person who claims that he agreed all the collaboration, is not getting their attention at all. The 'Purified' Imran Khan cannot see that the person who suspended the constitution, the person who committed crime against Pakistani people and the one who was accountable for all security ills for which he held PPP coalition Govt. respnsible, is in Pakistan. He should take this person to the INDEPENDENT supreme court for;
Taking Pakistan into 'American War'
Drone attacks on Pakistan
Terrorism inside Pakistan like Hazara community in Quetta (where he went to condole people)
Resultant destroyed economic environment
Murder of so many innocent Pakistanis and significant personalities due to the fact that Pakistan was ' taken into' American war.
If these parties cannot take Dictator to Justice then they have no right to say that they will give our beloved country, Pakistan, a different direction.
It is amazing to to note what has happened to the most vocal Punjabi; Shahbaz Sharif? Until recently he wanted to hang the elected President of Pakistan upside down. Why is he not raising his vice and mobilising people to bring the Dictator to Justice?
Where is Nawaz Sharif? The principled politician who took no time to take the President of Pakistan to Supreme court on so called "Memo-Gate"? Why is he not knocking at the door of Supreme Court regarding the dictator?
What has happened to the rest of PML-N? The party that draws pride from their 'struggle' for Democracy and 'pushing' the Dictator out of the country? Why they are not raising their voices?
Where is the biggest hypocrite of our political elite: Imran Khan? 'He will not take oath from a 'criminal' president'. But he took oath from a Dictator (Gen. Musharaf). According to the hypocrites of PTI, the current Goverment has been collaborating with USA regarding drone attacks and the person who claims that he agreed all the collaboration, is not getting their attention at all. The 'Purified' Imran Khan cannot see that the person who suspended the constitution, the person who committed crime against Pakistani people and the one who was accountable for all security ills for which he held PPP coalition Govt. respnsible, is in Pakistan. He should take this person to the INDEPENDENT supreme court for;
Taking Pakistan into 'American War'
Drone attacks on Pakistan
Terrorism inside Pakistan like Hazara community in Quetta (where he went to condole people)
Resultant destroyed economic environment
Murder of so many innocent Pakistanis and significant personalities due to the fact that Pakistan was ' taken into' American war.
If these parties cannot take Dictator to Justice then they have no right to say that they will give our beloved country, Pakistan, a different direction.
Monday 25 March 2013
The High Treason
A unanimously elected Prime Minister can be sent home. An elected president can be brought in front of a magistrate of another country for an 'alleged' crime. But a dictator cannot be taken notice of; reason being that the second part of Article 6 of the constitution of Pakistan states not only the one who suspends the constituion (Gen. Musharaf) but also the ones who collaborate (Pakistani Judiciary including current Chief Justice legitimised Martial Law in 1999) should be hanged to death.
The current 'face of change', Imran Khan, supported and campaigned for Gen. Mushraf in his referendum to become the President of Pakistan.
All are guilty of high treason.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RfvTCOWzQXk
The current 'face of change', Imran Khan, supported and campaigned for Gen. Mushraf in his referendum to become the President of Pakistan.
All are guilty of high treason.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RfvTCOWzQXk
Sunday 24 March 2013
PTI' new coalition partner while they search for new Pakistan
The leader of PTI has accepted this person as a coalition partner while he promises a new pakistan.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wQDKlHGwvdI
Imran Khan was elected under Gen. Mushraf to National Assembly, Gen. Mushraf was supporting USA, MMA and all religious elements were in government in PKP& Balochistan and Nato supply was on. As soon as PPP and its liberal partners came into power both for Imran Khan & all religious parties, 'supporting' USA became the biggest crime in Pakistani dictionary. Today both have signed a coalition agreement; what a coincidence. Hypocrisy at its best.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wQDKlHGwvdI
Imran Khan was elected under Gen. Mushraf to National Assembly, Gen. Mushraf was supporting USA, MMA and all religious elements were in government in PKP& Balochistan and Nato supply was on. As soon as PPP and its liberal partners came into power both for Imran Khan & all religious parties, 'supporting' USA became the biggest crime in Pakistani dictionary. Today both have signed a coalition agreement; what a coincidence. Hypocrisy at its best.
Standard of impartiality of PML-N
All political parties in government shared this point of view regarding the nominee of an impartial person for caretaker Prime Minister by the PML-N;
'The ECP had been told that Justice Zahid had not only wrongly implicated President Asif Ali Zardari in the murders case of his brother-in-law Justice Nizam Ahmed and his son in Karachi but he was also the head of the Supreme Court bench that had acquitted the PML-N workers in the famous case of the attack on the SC building'.
http://dawn.com/2013/03/24/ppp-speaks-out-against-pml-n-nominees-in-letter-to-ecp/
PML-N, instead of mud sledding nominees of parties in government, should reflect on their approach towards impartiality and learning from the politics of 'Godfathers' and victimization. What was the process that resulted in selecting such a biased individual and what was being expected by achieving success in get bias elected?
'The ECP had been told that Justice Zahid had not only wrongly implicated President Asif Ali Zardari in the murders case of his brother-in-law Justice Nizam Ahmed and his son in Karachi but he was also the head of the Supreme Court bench that had acquitted the PML-N workers in the famous case of the attack on the SC building'.
http://dawn.com/2013/03/24/ppp-speaks-out-against-pml-n-nominees-in-letter-to-ecp/
PML-N, instead of mud sledding nominees of parties in government, should reflect on their approach towards impartiality and learning from the politics of 'Godfathers' and victimization. What was the process that resulted in selecting such a biased individual and what was being expected by achieving success in get bias elected?
Saturday 23 March 2013
Supporting Dictatorship on the name of Change
Shafqat Mehmood - Provincial Minister of Gen. Musharaf defending MNA of Musharaf era: Imran Khan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6_yzBG4JaQ
Shafqat Mehmood 'I joined General Musharaf, but then left him after a year'. How can a Democrat join a dictator under any circumstances?
'Zardari's Party has finished'. PPP is not a General's brain chid and is not dependent on any individual. People support ideology and not individuals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6_yzBG4JaQ
Shafqat Mehmood 'I joined General Musharaf, but then left him after a year'. How can a Democrat join a dictator under any circumstances?
'Zardari's Party has finished'. PPP is not a General's brain chid and is not dependent on any individual. People support ideology and not individuals.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)